Thursday, 17 May 2012

Blue, Orange, Red, Grey... The Colours of Fringe.

Fringe ended last night in the UK (spoilers ahead for anyone who hasn't seen it) so it seems to be an appropriate time for me to have a rant about a plot point that they've had this year and how it has irked me somewhat.


As viewers of the show will know, Fringe has featured a number of different 'universes' over the years, with each one differentiated by the colour of the opening titles. Blue was the 'normal' universe, Red was the alternate one, Grey was the future. This season they introduced a new Orange universe which resulted from Peter being removed from existence.


Of course he came back, but he was the only character with any memory of the Blue universe.

The Orange universe continued to be used for the rest of the season, making everything the viewer had learned about the characters and plot from the previous three seasons irrelevant. Sometimes. And sometimes that old stuff had happened. Since Peter had previous dealings with the Red universe, this meant that all the characters from 'over there' were also changed and you couldn't be certain about their histories either any more. Characters who were once dead were now alive, characters who were good were now evil, and so on.

In many ways it was a reboot of the series, in what can only be assumed was a desperate hope to attract new viewers.


I'd assumed that Blue would return after a few episodes, but it didn't. Orange has remained for the entire season, with no indication that it's ever going away. So now I'm scratching my head and wondering what the point was of watching seasons 1-3. Those characters (apart from Peter and Olivia who got her 'old' memory back) are gone, like the series ended and was replaced with something else.


It's the uncertainty that gets to me. I can't be certain what happened previously, and therefore can't be certain of anyone's motives or actions. It's definitely not rewarding the viewer who has stuck with the series since the beginning.


The Orange universe just seems like a convenient way to write off any unexplained plot points, or bits the writers perhaps just don't like any more, from earlier in the series.


Plus the orange credits look no where near as nice as the blue ones did.

Tuesday, 15 May 2012

Creator Rights

There's been a lot of kerfuffle in the press recently about the rights of comics creators over their, well, creations. We've had fights over Superman rights, Starlin annoyed about Thanos, Before Watchmen, various writers quitting DC and so on and so on... Indeed, it doesn't seem that a day goes by without someone else being rather annoyed that their not receiving their due (ie money) for their work.

The problem is that every single person has been paid exactly what their contract stated. Some of the contracts were a bit crappy, but the creators signed anyway.

While it would seem a good idea to pay Kirby (or his estate) a load of money for the work he did, paying out retrospectively like this throws up a thousand problems.

The main one is how much do you pay? Say DC & Marvel were suddenly feeling very generous and decided to give Kirby et al some money for the use of their character. Would a couple of $ do? How about $100? What about writers who only created a minor character? And the artists, surely they deserve something to? What about reinventions of characters? Drax the Destroyer, or example was created by Friedrich & Starlin but then had a drastic makeover during Marvel's Annihilation event. Starlin created Thanos, but was heavily influenced by New Gods so should we give Kirby a little something too regarding that character?

Storytelling will suffer. Say you now have to pay Bendis some money every time Maria Hill appears. The Marvel editorial staff will almost certainly demand that she no longer be written into stories. And if Bendis got a percentage from her appearing in the Avengers movie, then suddenly she'd be replaced with a very similar character, yet with enough difference so payment wouldn't be needed.

All of the characters created for DC & Marvel were 'work for hire', which is the main reason why the creators don't get paid anything beyond the wage they were paid at the time. The Big Two own the characters & everything else the creators did at the time.

...which makes it all very similar to every other job on the planet. If I go and work for a pharmaceutical company and help create a super drug to eliminate cancer, I wouldn't get a cut of the inevitable billions of dollars that that drug would make. I'd get paid my salary and that's it.

These days things are a little more improved. There are numerous creator-owned comics being published these days. If you work for DC & Marvel then everything you create belongs to them. Sounds bad, but then you do get to play around with a pool of characters which includes Superman, Iron Man etc.

And these days everyone is much more wary of the details before signing a contract.

This doesn't help the old guys, though. They still only received what they were paid at the time, back before anyone imagined $billion movies would result from their work. I do not think they will ever get anything more, it's just too much muddy water to sort out who deserves what. Time to learn from the past and ensure things are better for the future.